Impact of space layout on energy performance of office buildings coupling daylight with thermal simulation

Journal Article (2019)
Author(s)

Tiantian Du (TU Delft - Climate Design and Sustainability)

SC Jansen (TU Delft - Building Services)

M Turrin (TU Delft - Design Informatics)

A. A.J.F. van den Dobbelsteen (TU Delft - Climate Design and Sustainability)

Research Group
Climate Design and Sustainability
Copyright
© 2019 T. Du, S.C. Jansen, M. Turrin, A.A.J.F. van den Dobbelsteen
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201911103077
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Copyright
© 2019 T. Du, S.C. Jansen, M. Turrin, A.A.J.F. van den Dobbelsteen
Research Group
Climate Design and Sustainability
Volume number
111
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Space layout design is one of the most important phases in architectural design, and current studies have shown that it can affect building energy performance. However, its influence has not been quantified. This paper aims at investigating the impact of space layouts on building energy performance. We use the floor plan of an office building in the Netherlands as reference, and propose eleven space layouts based on the reference. Calculations are performed with the tools Honeybee and Ladybug in Grasshopper, which are developed based on Daysim and EnergyPlus, to simulate lighting, cooling and heating demand of these layouts. In addition, we couple daylight with thermal simulation, by importing the artificial lighting schedule calculated in Daysim to EnergyPlus. The result shows that the heating demand of the worst layout is 12% higher than the best layout, the cooling demand of the worst layout is 10% higher than the best layout, and the lighting demand of the worst layout is 65% higher than the best layout. The total final energy use of the worst layout is 19% higher than the best layout.