Ghanaian Tropical Modernism between Adaptation and Control: The Case of Accra’s Community Centre

Student Report (2025)
Author(s)

A.M. Nozza (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Contributor(s)

Serah Calitz – Mentor (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Faculty
Architecture and the Built Environment
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Coordinates
5.543592,-0.203588
Graduation Date
17-04-2025
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Project
AR2A011, Architectural History Thesis
Programme
Architecture, Urbanism and Building Sciences
Faculty
Architecture and the Built Environment
Downloads counter
109
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This study examines the dual role of Tropical Modernism in colonial and postcolonial Ghana through Jane Drew and Maxwell Fry’s 1951 Accra Community Centre. Constructed in response to the 1948 anti-colonial riots, the Centre embodied Britain’s strategy to reassert control via architectural interventions. Blending modernist functionality with climate-responsive design, its spatial hierarchy camouflaged colonial dominance under the guise of civic progress. Archival plans and colonial records reveal how the Centre’s layout enforced social divisions, marginalising local agency while projecting Eurocentric modernity. Post-independence, Kwame Nkrumah’s government repurposed the site as the Young Pioneer Centre, transforming its colonial infrastructure into a tool for nationalist ideology. This duality underscores Tropical Modernism’s entanglement with power: initially a vehicle for imperial control, later adapted to assert African sovereignty. Drawing on critiques by scholars like Iain Jackson and Ola Uduku, the paper positions the Centre as a battleground for political ideologies, where architecture mediated colonial governance and postcolonial nation-building. By analysing its design, socio-political context, and legacy, the study illuminates how built environments function as instruments of social engineering, shaping identities and hierarchies across regimes. The findings contribute to broader discourses on colonial architecture’s enduring impact on urban landscapes and cultural negotiation in the Global South.

Files

License info not available