Active and passive monitoring of fault reactivation under stress cycling

Conference Paper (2022)
Author(s)

M. Naderloo (TU Delft - Applied Geophysics and Petrophysics)

A.V. Veltmeijer (TU Delft - Applied Geophysics and Petrophysics)

A Barnhoorn (TU Delft - Applied Geophysics and Petrophysics)

Research Group
Applied Geophysics and Petrophysics
Copyright
© 2022 M. Naderloo, A.V. Veltmeijer, A. Barnhoorn
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1190/image2022-3750358.1
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 M. Naderloo, A.V. Veltmeijer, A. Barnhoorn
Research Group
Applied Geophysics and Petrophysics
Volume number
2022-August
Pages (from-to)
1576-1580
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Increased seismicity due to subsurface activities has led to increased interest in monitoring and seismic risk mitigation. In this study we combined passive and active acoustic monitoring methods to monitor fault sliding and reactivation in the laboratory. Acoustic emission (AE) and ultrasonic transmission measurements were performed during stress-cycling to monitor stress-driven fault reactivation. We show the use of the transmissivity and coda wave interferometry of the active acoustic measurements and the number of generated AE events for fault reactivation monitoring. Combining these two methods, we are able to detect the different phases of fault reactivation process under stress cycling including, early aseismic creep (pre-slip), fault slip, and continuous sliding. Combining both active and passive monitoring increases accuracy of monitoring and can lead to better seismic risk mitigation

Files

SEG_Abstract_Final.pdf
(pdf | 0.754 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 01-07-2023
License info not available