Impact of different climatic conditions on peak core temperature of elite athletes during exercise in the heat

a Thermo Tokyo simulation study

Journal Article (2022)
Author(s)

Lennart P.J. Teunissen (TU Delft - Emerging Materials)

Kaspar Jansen (TU Delft - Emerging Materials)

Emiel Janssen (Student TU Delft)

Boris R.M. Kingma (TNO)

Johannus Q. De Korte (Radboud University Medical Center)

Thijs M.H. Eijsvogels (Radboud University Medical Center)

Research Group
Emerging Materials
Copyright
© 2022 L.P.J. Teunissen, K.M.B. Jansen, E.S. Janssen, Boris R.M. Kingma, Johannus Q. De Korte, Thijs M.H. Eijsvogels
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2022-001313
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 L.P.J. Teunissen, K.M.B. Jansen, E.S. Janssen, Boris R.M. Kingma, Johannus Q. De Korte, Thijs M.H. Eijsvogels
Research Group
Emerging Materials
Issue number
2
Volume number
8
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate how separate and combined climatic parameters affect peak core temperature during exercise in the heat using computer simulations fed with individual data. Methods The impact of eight environmental conditions on rectal temperature (T re) was determined for exercise under heat stress using the Fiala-thermal-Physiology-and-Comfort simulation model. Variations in ambient temperature (T a ±6°C), relative humidity (RH±15%) and solar radiation (SR+921 W/m 2) were assessed in isolation and combination (worst-case/best-case scenarios) and compared with baseline (T a 32°C, RH 75%, SR 0 W/m 2). The simulation model was fed with personal, anthropometric and individual exercise characteristics. Results 54 athletes exercised for 46±10 min at baseline conditions and achieved a peak core temperature of 38.9±0.5°C. Simulations at a higher T a (38°C) and SR (921 W/m 2) resulted in a higher peak T re compared with baseline (+0.6±0.3°C and +0.5±0.2°C, respectively), whereas a higher RH (90%) hardly affected peak T re (+0.1±0.1°C). A lower T a (26°C) and RH (60%) reduced peak T re by-0.4±0.2°C and a minor-0.1±0.1°C, respectively. The worst-case simulation yielded a 1.5±0.4°C higher T re than baseline and 2.0±0.7°C higher than the best-case condition. Conclusion Combined unfavourable climatic conditions produce a greater increase in peak core temperature than the sum of its parts in elite athletes exercising in the heat.