Library
local_library Home Repository

Digestibility of waste aerobic granular sludge from a full-scale municipal wastewater treatment system

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

Hongxiao Guo (TU Delft - Sanitary Engineering)

Jules B. van Lier (TU Delft - Sanitary Engineering)

Merle De Kreuk (TU Delft - Sanitary Engineering)

Research Group
Sanitary Engineering
Copyright
© 2020 H. Guo, J.B. van Lier, M.K. de Kreuk
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.115617
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Copyright
© 2020 H. Guo, J.B. van Lier, M.K. de Kreuk
Research Group
Sanitary Engineering
Volume number
173
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Full-scale aerobic granular sludge technology under the trade name Nereda® has been implemented for municipal, as well as industrial wastewater treatment. Owing to the operational reactor procedures, two types of waste aerobic granular sludge can be clearly distinguished: 1) aerobic granular sludge selection discharge (AGS-SD) and 2) aerobic granular sludge mixture (AGS-RTC). This study systematically compared the anaerobic biodegradability of AGS-SD and AGS-RTC under mesophilic conditions. Results were further compared with the anaerobic conversion of waste activated sludge (WAS) as well as primary sludge (PS) from full-scale municipal wastewater treatment plants. Analysis showed similar chemical characteristics for AGS-SD and PS, which were both characterized by a high carbohydrate content (429 ± 21 and 464 ± 15 mg glucose/g VS sludge, respectively), mainly cellulosic fibres. Concurrently, AGS-RTC exhibited chemical properties close to WAS, both characterized by a relatively high protein content, which were individually 498 ± 14 and 389 ± 15 mg/g VS sludge. AGS-SD was characterized by a high biochemical methane potential (BMP) (296 ± 15 mL CH4/g VS substrate), which was similar to that of PS, and remarkably higher than that of AGS-RTC and WAS. Strikingly, the BMP of AGS-RTC (194 ± 10 mL CH4/g VS substrate) was significantly lower than that of WAS (232 ± 11 mL CH4/g VS substrate). Mechanically destroying the compact structure of AGS-RTC only accelerated the methane production rate but did not significantly affect the BMP value. Results indicated that compared to WAS, the proteins and carbohydrates in AGS-RTC were both more resistant to anaerobic bio-degradation, which might be related to the presence of refractory microbial metabolic products in AGS-RTC.