Is it all about mobile phones? Exploring drivers’ perceptions of government information and road rules on distracted driving

Journal Article (2024)
Author(s)

Sina Rejali (Queensland University of Technology)

Natalie Watson-Brown (Queensland University of Technology)

Sherrie Anne Kaye (Queensland University of Technology)

Teresa Senserrick (University of Western Australia)

Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios (TU Delft - Values Technology and Innovation, TU Delft - Safety and Security Science)

Research Group
Safety and Security Science
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2024.107770 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Research Group
Safety and Security Science
Volume number
208
Article number
107770
Downloads counter
193
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Distracted driving is a traffic safety issue worldwide. While the development of comprehensive information and road rules about distracted driving by governments is essential to address the issue, there is evidence showing that existing road rules and information may not always deter drivers from engaging in distractions while driving. Therefore, this study explored drivers’ views on government information and road rules concerning distracted driving, aiming to understand how these rules and information have shaped drivers’ perceptions and behaviour towards distractions. Interviews (n = 35) were conducted with Queensland drivers aged between 21 and 70 years and a thematic analysis was used to explore the data. Based on the findings, government information on distracted driving was believed by participants to be incomprehensive, not effectively communicated, and focused on mobile phone use. Road rules and enforcement measures often prioritise mobile phone use and contain grey areas that may confuse drivers about legal and illegal distractions. The results showed that the perceived risk of distractions varies among drivers, with some distractions not being considered as risky as other behaviours (e.g., using a smartwatch). Findings showed that government practices are believed to influence drivers’ perceptions and behaviour about distracted driving, encouraging an inaccurate perception about driver safety and with the potential to prompt drivers to engage with distracting behaviours without knowledge nor consideration of the risks. The results of this study offer important insights for policymakers in developing and disseminating comprehensive information and road rules for distracted driving.