Microbubble Composition and Preparation for High-Frequency Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging
In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation
Verya Daeichin ( Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam)
Tom van Rooij ( Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam)
Ilya Skachkov ( Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Universiteit Utrecht)
Bülent Ergin (Universiteit van Amsterdam)
Patricia Ac Specht ( Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam)
Alexandre Lima ( Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam)
Can Ince ( Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam)
Johan G. Bosch (Erasmus MC)
A. F.W. Steen (ImPhys/Acoustical Wavefield Imaging , Erasmus MC, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technologies)
Nico de Jong (ImPhys/Acoustical Wavefield Imaging , Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Netherlands Heart Institute)
Klazina Kooiman (Erasmus MC)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Although high-frequency ultrasound imaging is gaining attention in various applications, hardly any ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) dedicated to such frequencies (>15 MHz) are available for contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging. Moreover, the composition of the limited commercially available UCAs for high-frequency CEUS (hfCEUS) is largely unknown, while shell properties have been shown to be an important factor for their performance. The aim of our study was to produce UCAs in-house for hfCEUS. Twelve different UCA formulations A-L were made by either sonication or mechanical agitation. The gas core consisted of C4F10 and the main coating lipid was either 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DSPC; A-F formulation) or 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPPC; G-L formulation). Mechanical agitation resulted in UCAs with smaller microbubbles (number weighted mean diameter ∼1 μm) than sonication (number weighted mean diameter ∼2 μm} ). UCA formulations with similar size distributions but different main lipid components showed that the DPPC-based UCA formulations had higher nonlinear responses at both the fundamental and subharmonic frequencies in vitro for hfCEUS using the Vevo2100 high-frequency preclinical scanner (FUJIFILM VisualSonics, Inc.). In addition, UCA formulations F (DSPC-based) and L (DPPC-based) that were made by mechanical agitation performed similar in vitro to the commercially available Target-Ready MicroMarker (FUJIFILM VisualSonics, Inc.). UCA formulation F also performed similar to Target-Ready MicroMarker in vivo in pigs with similar mean contrast intensity within the kidney ( n = 7 ), but formulation L did not. This is likely due to the lower stability of formulation L in vivo. Our study shows that DSPC-based microbubbles produced by mechanical agitation resulted in small microbubbles with high nonlinear responses suitable for hfCEUS imaging.