Microbubble Composition and Preparation for High-Frequency Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging

In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation

Journal Article (2017)
Author(s)

Verya Daeichin ( Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam)

Tom van Rooij ( Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam)

Ilya Skachkov ( Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Universiteit Utrecht)

Bulent Ergin (Universiteit van Amsterdam)

Patricia A.C. Specht ( Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam)

Alexandre Lima ( Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam)

Can Ince ( Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam)

Johan G. Bosch (Erasmus MC)

Antonius F.W. Van Der Steen (ImPhys/Acoustical Wavefield Imaging , Erasmus MC, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technologies)

Nico De Jong (ImPhys/Acoustical Wavefield Imaging , Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Netherlands Heart Institute)

Klazina Kooiman (Erasmus MC)

ImPhys/Acoustical Wavefield Imaging
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2016.2640342 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2017
Language
English
ImPhys/Acoustical Wavefield Imaging
Journal title
IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control
Issue number
3
Volume number
64
Article number
7784837
Pages (from-to)
555-567
Downloads counter
435
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Although high-frequency ultrasound imaging is gaining attention in various applications, hardly any ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) dedicated to such frequencies (>15 MHz) are available for contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging. Moreover, the composition of the limited commercially available UCAs for high-frequency CEUS (hfCEUS) is largely unknown, while shell properties have been shown to be an important factor for their performance. The aim of our study was to produce UCAs in-house for hfCEUS. Twelve different UCA formulations A-L were made by either sonication or mechanical agitation. The gas core consisted of C4F10 and the main coating lipid was either 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DSPC; A-F formulation) or 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPPC; G-L formulation). Mechanical agitation resulted in UCAs with smaller microbubbles (number weighted mean diameter ∼1 μm) than sonication (number weighted mean diameter ∼2 μm} ). UCA formulations with similar size distributions but different main lipid components showed that the DPPC-based UCA formulations had higher nonlinear responses at both the fundamental and subharmonic frequencies in vitro for hfCEUS using the Vevo2100 high-frequency preclinical scanner (FUJIFILM VisualSonics, Inc.). In addition, UCA formulations F (DSPC-based) and L (DPPC-based) that were made by mechanical agitation performed similar in vitro to the commercially available Target-Ready MicroMarker (FUJIFILM VisualSonics, Inc.). UCA formulation F also performed similar to Target-Ready MicroMarker in vivo in pigs with similar mean contrast intensity within the kidney ( n = 7 ), but formulation L did not. This is likely due to the lower stability of formulation L in vivo. Our study shows that DSPC-based microbubbles produced by mechanical agitation resulted in small microbubbles with high nonlinear responses suitable for hfCEUS imaging.