Transit Time Estimation in Catchments

Recent Developments and Future Directions

Review (2022)
Author(s)

Paolo Benettin (École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne)

Nicolas B. Rodriguez (Institut National de Recherche Pour L’Agriculture, L’Alimentation et L’Environnement (INRAE))

Matthias Sprenger (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory)

Minseok Kim (Pusan National University)

Julian Klaus (Universität Bonn)

Ciaran J. Harman (Johns Hopkins University)

Ype van der Velde (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Markus Hrachowitz (TU Delft - Water Resources)

Gianluca Botter (Università degli Studi di Padova)

undefined More Authors (External organisation)

DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR033096 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Issue number
11
Volume number
58
Article number
e2022WR033096
Downloads counter
375
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Water transit time is now a standard measure in catchment hydrological and ecohydrological research. The last comprehensive review of transit time modeling approaches was published 15+ years ago. But since then the field has largely expanded with new data, theory and applications. Here, we review these new developments with focus on water-age-balance approaches and data-based approaches. We discuss and compare methods including StorAge-Selection functions, well/partially mixed compartments, water age tracking through spatially distributed models, direct transit time estimates from controlled experiments, young water fractions, and ensemble hydrograph separation. We unify some of the heterogeneity in the literature that has crept in with these many new approaches, in an attempt to clarify the key differences and similarities among them. Finally, we point to open questions in transit time research, including what we still need from theory, models, field work, and community practice.