Local Alternative for Energy Supply

Performance Assessment of Integrated Community Energy Systems

Journal Article (2016)
Author(s)

B.P. Koirala (TU Delft - Energy and Industry)

JP Chaves Avila (Comillas Pontifical University)

T. Gomez (Comillas Pontifical University)

R.A. Hakvoort (TU Delft - Energy and Industry)

PM Herder (TU Delft - Energy and Industry)

Research Group
Energy and Industry
Copyright
© 2016 B.P. Koirala, J.P. Chaves Avila, T. Gomez, R.A. Hakvoort, P.M. Herder
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.3390/en9120981
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2016
Language
English
Copyright
© 2016 B.P. Koirala, J.P. Chaves Avila, T. Gomez, R.A. Hakvoort, P.M. Herder
Related content
Research Group
Energy and Industry
Issue number
12
Volume number
9
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Integrated community energy systems (ICESs) are emerging as a modern development to re-organize local energy systems allowing simultaneous integration of distributed energy resources (DERs) and engagement of local communities. Although local energy initiatives, such as ICESs are rapidly emerging due to community objectives, such as cost and emission reductions as well as resiliency, assessment and evaluation are still lacking on the value that these systems can provide both to the local communities as well as to the whole energy system. In this paper, we present a model-based framework to assess the value of ICESs for the local communities. The distributed energy resources-consumer adoption model (DER-CAM) based ICES model is used to assess the value of an ICES in the Netherlands. For the considered community size and local conditions, grid-connected ICESs are already beneficial to the alternative of solely being supplied from the grid both in terms of total energy costs and CO2 emissions, whereas grid-defected systems, although performing very well in terms of CO2 emission reduction, are still rather expensive.