Sequential Fe2+ oxidation to mitigate the inhibiting effect of phosphate and silicate on arsenic removal

Journal Article (2022)
Author(s)

M. Annaduzzaman (TU Delft - Sanitary Engineering)

LC Rietveld (TU Delft - Water Management)

Bilqis Amin Amin Hoque (Environment and Population Research Centre)

D. van Halem (TU Delft - Sanitary Engineering)

Research Group
Sanitary Engineering
Copyright
© 2022 M. Annaduzzaman, L.C. Rietveld, Bilqis Amin Hoque, D. van Halem
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2022.100749
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 M. Annaduzzaman, L.C. Rietveld, Bilqis Amin Hoque, D. van Halem
Related content
Research Group
Sanitary Engineering
Volume number
17
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Sequential iron (as Fe2+) oxidation has been found to yield improved arsenic (as As(III)) uptake than the single-step oxidation. The objective of this study was to gain a better understanding of interactions with phosphate (PO43−) and silicate (SiO42−) during sequential Fe2+ and As(III) oxidation and removal, as these are typically found in groundwater and known to interfere with As removal. The laboratory experiments were performed using single and multi-step jar tests with an initial As(III/V), Fe2+, PO43−, SiO42− concentrations, and pH of 200 μg/L, 2.5 mg/L, 2 mg/L, 16 mg/L and 7.0, respectively representing the targeted natural groundwater in Rajshahi district, Bangladesh. The sequential Fe2+ and As(III) oxidation in the multi-step jar tests indicated that the PO43− hindrance on As removal in the first Fe2+ oxidation step was compensated for in the second. Moreover, smaller Fe flocs (<0.45 μm) were observed in the presence of SiO42−, potentially providing more surface area during the second Fe2+ oxidation step leading to better overall As removal. Altogether it may be concluded that controlling the As(III) and Fe2+ oxidation sequence is beneficial for As removal compared to single-step Fe2+ oxidation, both in the presence and absence of PO43− and/or SiO42−.