Comparative validation of handheld fractional exhaled nitric oxide measurements

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Sanne van Deelen (TU Delft - Sports & Games, TU Delft - Pattern Recognition and Bioinformatics, Erasmus MC)

Gerdien A. Tramper-Stranders (Erasmus MC)

Rudi W. Hendriks (Erasmus MC)

Marcel J.T. Reinders (TU Delft - Pattern Recognition and Bioinformatics)

Gert Jan Braunstahl (Erasmus MC)

Research Group
Pattern Recognition and Bioinformatics
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2025.2499652
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Pattern Recognition and Bioinformatics
Issue number
6
Volume number
22
Pages (from-to)
643-650
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Background: Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a noninvasive method to determine the degree of airway inflammation. Handheld devices such as the Vivatmo Me are used for home monitoring. Differences were found between the Vivatmo Me and standard measurements with the NIOX VERO. Therefore, we aimed to determine the accuracy of the Vivatmo Me for FeNO measurements. Methods: Adult patients with an appointment for FeNO-measurement according to regular care, were invited to perform the FeNO measurement with both devices. From these measurements the FeNO values were compared, and the device user-friendliness was determined. Results: One hundred and sixty-four patients were included. The number of attempts needed for a successful measurement and the failure rate were higher with the Vivatmo Me. Although the measurements were highly correlated, a significant difference (p < 0.001) was found between FeNO values measured with both devices. From the Vivatmo measurements, 32% did not fall within the claimed accuracy ranges. A linear correction on the FeNO values reduced this number. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that the Vivatmo Me does not comply with the claimed accuracy of clinical FeNO measurements and the measurement is challenging to perform. By applying the proposed correction, the comparative validity of the FeNO measurement improves and therefore its clinical usefulness.

Files

Comparative_validation_of_hand... (pdf)
(pdf | 2.19 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 16-01-2026
Taverne