Filtering out standard success criteria in the case of multi-mode standardization

Responsible waste water treatment

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

G. Van de Kaa (TU Delft - Economics of Technology and Innovation)

Lieke van den Eijnden (Fluor corporation)

N. Doom (TU Delft - Ethics & Philosophy of Technology)

Research Group
Economics of Technology and Innovation
Copyright
© 2020 G. van de Kaa, Lieke van den Eijnden, N. Doorn
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041641
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Copyright
© 2020 G. van de Kaa, Lieke van den Eijnden, N. Doorn
Research Group
Economics of Technology and Innovation
Issue number
4
Volume number
12
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Standardization can be achieved in multiple ways; firms may join forces and develop standards in standardization committees, they may compete directly on the market in standards battles, or governmental agencies may impose standards. This paper studies criteria for the selection of standards in a situation in which these three forms of standardization occur simultaneously (multi-mode standardization). The paper attempts to arrive at weights for these criteria by applying them to the case of phosphorus recovery from municipal waste water, a technological process that fits the transition to a circular economy but that is still lacking standardization. A contribution is made to the standardization literature by empirically studying the case of multi-mode standardization and by applying standard success criteria to the area of water treatment.