Transient Stable Corrective Control Using Neural Lyapunov Learning

Journal Article (2022)
Author(s)

F. Bellizio (Imperial College London)

Jochen L. Cremer (TU Delft - Intelligent Electrical Power Grids)

G Strbac (Imperial College London)

Research Group
Intelligent Electrical Power Grids
Copyright
© 2022 Federica Bellizio, Jochen Cremer, Goran Strbac
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2022.3204459
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 Federica Bellizio, Jochen Cremer, Goran Strbac
Research Group
Intelligent Electrical Power Grids
Issue number
4
Volume number
38
Pages (from-to)
3245-3253
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This paper proposes a method to compute corrective control actions for dynamic security in real-time and quantifies the economic value of corrective control. Lowered inertia requires fast control methods in real-time to correct system operation and maintain system security when equipment fails. However, using corrective control beyond such emergency failure measures does not make fully use of them. The key contribution of this work is the optimal use of corrective control applications in combination with preventive strategies to enhance the network utilisation, reduce the normal operating costs while maintaining adequate security levels. The proposed approach learns a neural network for safety certificates and models the predicted safe dynamic post-fault state as algebraic constraints in an AC optimal power flow (OPF) deciding close to real-time on the optimal corrective control. Considering these safety constraints within the ACOPF can balance simultaneously the system transient stability with the costs for preventive and corrective control. This proposed approach outperforms sub-optimal approaches aiming at sequentially finding the balance. Case studies were based on the IEEE 9-bus system with integrated electrical vehicles and shares of wind power up-to 40% and on the IEEE 39-bus and 118-bus systems. The proposed approach outperforms baseline control approaches in stability, economics, and carbon emissions. One baseline approach was preventive wind curtailment, against which the proposed approach reduced operating costs by up-to 60%, decreased unstable operations by 50% and reduced carbon emissions by 60% in the IEEE 9-bus. In the IEEE 39-bus and 118-bus systems, the approach was promising for larger systems.