Steady-State Stand-Alone Power Flow Solvers for Integrated Transmission-Distribution Networks

A Comparison Study and Numerical Assessment

Journal Article (2021)
Author(s)

M.E. Kootte (TU Delft - Numerical Analysis)

C. Vuik (TU Delft - Numerical Analysis)

Research Group
Numerical Analysis
Copyright
© 2021 M.E. Kootte, Cornelis Vuik
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.3390/en14185784
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2021
Language
English
Copyright
© 2021 M.E. Kootte, Cornelis Vuik
Research Group
Numerical Analysis
Issue number
18
Volume number
14
Pages (from-to)
1-19
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This paper compares and assesses several numerical methods that solve the steady-state power flow problem on integrated transmission-distribution networks. The integrated network model consists of a balanced transmission and an unbalanced distribution network. It is important to analyze these integrated electrical power systems due to the changes related to the energy transition. We classified the existing integration methods as unified and splitting methods. These methods can be applied to homogeneous (complete three-phase) and hybrid (single-phase/three-phase) network models, which results in four approaches in total. These approaches were compared on their accuracy and numerical performance—CPU time and number of iterations—to demonstrate their applicability on large-scale electricity networks. Furthermore, their sensitivity towards the amount of distributed generation and the addition of multiple distribution feeders was investigated. The methods were assessed by running power flow simulations using the Newton–Raphson method on several integrated power systems up to 25,000 unknowns. The assessment showed that unified methods applied to hybrid networks performed the best on these test cases. The splitting methods are advantageous when complete network data sharing between system operators is not allowed. The use of high-performance techniques for larger test cases containing multiple distribution networks will make the difference in speed less significant.