M.E. Kootte
Please Note
9 records found
1
To develop a framework to run integrated power flow simulations, we have worked in two stages. Firstly, we have studied how we can model an integrated network. We have found two ways of modelling an integrated network: using a homogeneous configuration in which both networks are modelled using three phases and using a hybrid network configuration in which both networks keep their original configuration but in which the coupling substation takes care of the phase dimension mismatch between the two sides. Next to that, we have found two ways of solving an integrated system: either by coupling them into one system and solving that as a whole (we call this the unified approach) or by keeping two separate systems and iterating between these networks (we call this the Manager‐Fellow Splitting (MFS) method).
We have concluded that the unified methods are generally faster than MFS methods and that a hybrid network configuration leads to faster results, making the interconnected method the most efficient.
In the second stage, we have focused on the efficiency of these simulations. During every Newton‐Raphson iteration in power flow simulations, a linear system is solved. We have therefore studied several Krylov subspace and preconditioning techniques that can solve this linear system efficiently. We have applied Krylov and preconditioning combinations to integrated network simulations to check again the performances of the simulations on large test cases . During this stage, we applied them to networks up to a size of 800,000 buses as we were interested in efficient scaling of the methods that were originally the object of study.
In the second stage, we saw that the MFS methods were performing better than unified methods. Furthermore, preconditioned Krylov subspace methods had a similar performance to direct methods. t is difficult to judge why this happened. A reason could be that the library in which we performed these simulations, PETSc, is optimised for parallel computations in which multiple smaller blocks are solved at the same time whilst we were doing only sequential computations.
Finally, we have striven to incorporate operational convenience for Transmission and Distribution System Operators (TSOs and DSOs) during the development of this integration framework, by considering their computational and privacy concerns. The way that this framework is built, can take away some of their concerns.
To summarise, we have created an open‐source framework to run efficient steady-state power flow simulations on integrated transmission and distribution networks. This framework is tested on simplified test cases but shows potential for large system simulations. Moreover, it takes into account the considerations of system operators and can be utilised in other applications besides integrated analysis. ...
To develop a framework to run integrated power flow simulations, we have worked in two stages. Firstly, we have studied how we can model an integrated network. We have found two ways of modelling an integrated network: using a homogeneous configuration in which both networks are modelled using three phases and using a hybrid network configuration in which both networks keep their original configuration but in which the coupling substation takes care of the phase dimension mismatch between the two sides. Next to that, we have found two ways of solving an integrated system: either by coupling them into one system and solving that as a whole (we call this the unified approach) or by keeping two separate systems and iterating between these networks (we call this the Manager‐Fellow Splitting (MFS) method).
We have concluded that the unified methods are generally faster than MFS methods and that a hybrid network configuration leads to faster results, making the interconnected method the most efficient.
In the second stage, we have focused on the efficiency of these simulations. During every Newton‐Raphson iteration in power flow simulations, a linear system is solved. We have therefore studied several Krylov subspace and preconditioning techniques that can solve this linear system efficiently. We have applied Krylov and preconditioning combinations to integrated network simulations to check again the performances of the simulations on large test cases . During this stage, we applied them to networks up to a size of 800,000 buses as we were interested in efficient scaling of the methods that were originally the object of study.
In the second stage, we saw that the MFS methods were performing better than unified methods. Furthermore, preconditioned Krylov subspace methods had a similar performance to direct methods. t is difficult to judge why this happened. A reason could be that the library in which we performed these simulations, PETSc, is optimised for parallel computations in which multiple smaller blocks are solved at the same time whilst we were doing only sequential computations.
Finally, we have striven to incorporate operational convenience for Transmission and Distribution System Operators (TSOs and DSOs) during the development of this integration framework, by considering their computational and privacy concerns. The way that this framework is built, can take away some of their concerns.
To summarise, we have created an open‐source framework to run efficient steady-state power flow simulations on integrated transmission and distribution networks. This framework is tested on simplified test cases but shows potential for large system simulations. Moreover, it takes into account the considerations of system operators and can be utilised in other applications besides integrated analysis.
Fluctuating electricity prices offer potential economic savings for the consumption of electricity by flexible assets such as Electric Vehicles (EVs). This study proposes an operational bidding framework that minimizes the charging costs of an EV fleet by submitting an optimized bid to the day-ahead electricity market. The framework consists of a bidding module that determines the most cost-effective bid by considering an electricity price and an EV charging demand forecast module. In this study we develop and evaluate several regression and machine learning models that forecast the electricity price and EV charging demand. Furthermore, we examine the composition of a most optimal operational bidding framework by comparing the outcome of the bidding module when fed with each of the forecast models. This is determined by considering the day-ahead electricity price and imbalance costs due to forecast errors. The study demonstrates that the best performing self-contained forecast models with the objective of electricity price and EV charging demand forecasting, do not deliver the best overall results when included in the bidding framework. Additionally, the results show that the best performing framework obtains a 26% cost savings compared to a reference case where EVs are charged inflexibly. This corresponds to an achieved savings potential of 92%. Consequently, along with the developed bidding framework, these results provide a fundamental basis for effective electricity trading on the day-ahead market.
Power ow simulations form an essential tool for electricity network analysis but conventional models are designed to work on a separated transmission or distribution network only. The continuing growth of electricity consumption, demand side participation, and renewable resources makes the electricity net- works co-dependent. Integrated models incorporate the coupling of the net- works and interaction that they have on each other, representing the power ow within this changing environment accurately. Several numerical methods are available to solve the power ow problem on integrated networks. They can be categorized as a untied or as a splitting method and networks can be modelled as a homogeneous or hybrid network. In this paper, we review and assess these methods on the network models by running simulations on small test networks and comparing the outcome on their numerical performance, ie on convergence rate and CPU-time. The re- view shows that the convergence rate is comparable for most of the methods, but that hybrid networks have a slight advantage in computational time. Realistic network models, running on millions of buses and with large distribution networks, should give a better insight into the speed of the computations. ...
Power ow simulations form an essential tool for electricity network analysis but conventional models are designed to work on a separated transmission or distribution network only. The continuing growth of electricity consumption, demand side participation, and renewable resources makes the electricity net- works co-dependent. Integrated models incorporate the coupling of the net- works and interaction that they have on each other, representing the power ow within this changing environment accurately. Several numerical methods are available to solve the power ow problem on integrated networks. They can be categorized as a untied or as a splitting method and networks can be modelled as a homogeneous or hybrid network. In this paper, we review and assess these methods on the network models by running simulations on small test networks and comparing the outcome on their numerical performance, ie on convergence rate and CPU-time. The re- view shows that the convergence rate is comparable for most of the methods, but that hybrid networks have a slight advantage in computational time. Realistic network models, running on millions of buses and with large distribution networks, should give a better insight into the speed of the computations.
Steady-State Stand-Alone Power Flow Solvers for Integrated Transmission-Distribution Networks
A Comparison Study and Numerical Assessment
An integrated network consists of a transmission network and at least one distribution network which are connected to each other via a substation. One way to do power flow simulations on these integrated networks is the Master-Slave splitting method. This method splits the integrated network and iterates between the separate transmission (the master) and distribution (the slave) network. In this paper, we extend the method to hybrid networks: a network consisting of a balanced transmission and an unbalanced distribution network. An extra handling is necessary to get the Master-slave splitting to work on hybrid networks. We explain two approaches to use the Master-Slave splitting on a hybrid network and compare these approaches on accuracy, computational time, and convergence, by doing test-simulations. The Master-Slave splitting is interesting when distribution and transmission systems have different characteristics, are in geographically distinct locations, or when system operators are not able or allowed to share data of their network with each other. The extension to hybrid networks makes this method generally applicable and an interesting choice to do power flow simulations on integrated networks.
Load flow computations for (integrated) Transmission and Distribution systems
A literature review
Solving the Steady-State Power Flow Problem on Integrated Transmission-Distribution Networks
A Comparison of Numerical Methods