Thickness-Dependent Refractive Index of 1L, 2L, and 3L MoS 2 , MoSe 2 , WS 2 , and WSe 2

Journal Article (2019)
Author(s)

Chunwei Hsu (TU Delft - Applied Sciences, Kavli institute of nanoscience Delft, Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid (ICMM))

Riccardo Frisenda (Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid (ICMM))

Robert Schmidt (Universität Münster)

Ashish Arora (Universität Münster)

Steffen Michaelis de Vasconcellos (Universität Münster)

Rudolf Bratschitsch (Universität Münster)

Herre S.J. van der Zant (TU Delft - Applied Sciences, Kavli institute of nanoscience Delft)

Andres Castellanos-Gomez (Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid (ICMM))

Research Group
QN/van der Zant Lab
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201900239 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Research Group
QN/van der Zant Lab
Journal title
Advanced Optical Materials
Issue number
13
Volume number
7
Article number
1900239
Downloads counter
473
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract


An interesting aspect of 2D materials is the change of their electronic structure with the reduction of thickness. Molybdenum and tungsten-based transition metal dichalcogenides form an important family of 2D materials, whose members show a thickness-dependent bandgap and strong light–matter interaction. In this work, the experimental determination of the complex refractive index of 1-, 2-, 3-layer thick MoS
2
, MoSe
2
, WS
2
, and WSe
2
in the range from 400 to 850 nm of the electromagnetic spectrum is reported by using microreflectance spectroscopy and combined with calculations based on the Fresnel equations. It is further provided a comparison with the bulk refractive index values reported in the literature and a discussion of the difference/similarity between our work and the monolayer refractive index available from the literature, finding that the results from different techniques are in good agreement.