Tidal River Flood Risk Highest During Intermediate Rather Than Peak River Discharge

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Leicheng Guo (East China Normal University)

Adam T. Devlin (University of Hawai'i)

Ton Hoitink (Wageningen University & Research)

Ian Townend (University of Southampton)

David A. Jay (Portland State University)

Zheng Bing Wang (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences, Deltares)

Chunyan Zhu (East China Normal University)

Hamed R. Moftakhari (The University of Alabama)

Qing He (East China Normal University)

Fan Xu (East China Normal University)

Yuanyang Wan (Shanghai Estuarine and Coastal Research Center)

Yuan Xu (East China Normal University)

Weiming Xie (East China Normal University)

Research Group
Coastal Engineering
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025AV002247 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Coastal Engineering
Journal title
AGU Advances
Issue number
3
Volume number
7
Article number
e2025AV002247
Downloads counter
30
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Tidal rivers are defined as the tide-influenced, salinity-free inland reaches of estuaries. Understanding the occurrence of peak water levels (PWLs) is critical for flood risk management, yet the timing and magnitude of PWLs in tidal rivers have been little studied. We address this gap by investigating PWLs during two catastrophic floods (1954 and 2020) in the tidal Yangtze River, which reveals that PWLs are higher during perigean spring tides under intermediate discharges following peak flow. Three factors modulate the PWLs in tidal rivers: river-enhanced tidal damping, flow-elevation hysteresis that raises the falling flow limb of the hydrograph, and low-frequency subharmonics. The latter, arising from nonlinear river-tide interactions, are distinct in tidal rivers and culminate under intermediate river flow as a result of the balance between tidal energy dissipation and the spectral energy transfer to subharmonics. They elevate PWLs by up to 0.3 m during perigean spring tides in the Yangtze case and amplify compound flood risk. Channel degradation has reduced tidal damping compared with circumstances in the 1950s, resulting in larger tidal ranges and record-breaking PWLs during the 2020 flood despite a smaller peak discharge. We identify tidal rivers spanning over 3,380 km in worldwide estuaries and deltas, where prevalent subharmonics like MSf are up to 0.65 m in amplitude. Many of those experience even larger tidal amplification due to channel deepening, implying escalating flooding risk under sea-level rise and human impact. These findings underscore a need to include nonlinear river-tide interactions in flood risk assessment for river-coast transition zones.