Understanding cross-sectoral innovations for urban water management through the lens of organizational ambidexterity

Journal Article (2023)
Author(s)

E.M. Nieuwenhuis (TU Delft - Sanitary Engineering)

Hans M.C.J. de Bruijn (TU Delft - Organisation & Governance)

E.H.W.J. Cuppen (Rathenau Institute - KNAW, Universiteit Leiden)

Jeroen Langeveld (TU Delft - Sanitary Engineering, Partners4UrbanWater)

Research Group
Sanitary Engineering
Copyright
© 2023 E.M. Nieuwenhuis, J.A. de Bruijn, Eefje Cuppen, J.G. Langeveld
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2023.2251973
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Copyright
© 2023 E.M. Nieuwenhuis, J.A. de Bruijn, Eefje Cuppen, J.G. Langeveld
Research Group
Sanitary Engineering
Issue number
9
Volume number
20
Pages (from-to)
1183-1195
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Urban water systems worldwide need integrated, cross-sectoral innovations to anticipate developments like climate change and population growth. Development and implementation of such innovations is challenging due to the operational and sectoral mindset of organizations in which these innovations take place. This study uses the concept of ambidexterity to get a better understanding of how organizations responsible for urban water management deal with the tension between operation and the need for innovation. We focused on Amsterdam and Rotterdam, two Dutch cities that are global frontrunners in urban water management. Combining a desk study with 25 semi-structured interviews, we found four mechanisms to manage innovation and operation tensions: network, hierarchical, process and human-resource mechnanisms. Different from the literature on ambidexterity, our empirical findings show that the connection between operation and innovation is dominated by networks rather than by executives. Hierarchical mechanisms could be used to complement this, catalyzing innovation or formalizing it.