Lightweight Distance and Relative Radial Velocity Estimation with a Passive RF Receiver

Bachelor Thesis (2026)
Author(s)

M. Székely (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Contributor(s)

A. Asadi – Mentor (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

F.L. Kosterhon – Mentor (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

G. Iosifidis – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Faculty
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Graduation Date
25-06-2026
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Project
CSE3000 Research Project
Programme
Computer Science and Engineering
Faculty
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science
Downloads counter
16
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Reliable positioning is essential for autonomous drones, yet global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) can become unreliable or unavailable. This work compares passive RF-based methods for estimating distance and relative radial velocity with a single unsynchronized receiver. Calibrated RSSI ranging and direct Doppler estimation are selected as lightweight approaches and evaluated using an RFSoC 4x2-based prototype with a continuous-wave signal. Under controlled indoor conditions, calibrated RSSI achieves a mean absolute percentage error of 6.3% over the tested positions, although antenna orientation changes RSSI by almost 7 dB at a fixed distance. Doppler estimation, with clock offset estimated from stationary measurements before and after motion, recovers the correct motion direction in all motion trials and achieves a mean absolute error of 0.33 m/s. The motion-trial RMSE and the stationary null-test standard deviation were both 0.43 m/s, suggesting that imperfect clock-offset compensation and estimator uncertainty account for a substantial part of the radial-velocity estimation error. The results show that both methods provide lightweight distance and radial-velocity features, but their accuracy is limited by propagation conditions and oscillator stability.

Files

License info not available