Sensitivity of secondary electron yields and SEM images to scattering parameters in MC simulations

Journal Article (2016)
Author(s)

T. Verduin (TU Delft - ImPhys/Charged Particle Optics)

S. R. Lokhorst (TU Delft - ImPhys/Charged Particle Optics)

Cornelis W. Hagen (TU Delft - ImPhys/Charged Particle Optics)

P. Kruit (TU Delft - ImPhys/Charged Particle Optics)

Research Group
ImPhys/Charged Particle Optics
Copyright
© 2016 T. Verduin, S.R. Lokhorst, C.W. Hagen, P. Kruit
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2016.03.027
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2016
Language
English
Copyright
© 2016 T. Verduin, S.R. Lokhorst, C.W. Hagen, P. Kruit
Research Group
ImPhys/Charged Particle Optics
Volume number
155
Pages (from-to)
114-117
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

In the simulation of secondary electron yields (SEY) and secondary electron microscopy (SEM) images, there is always the question: are we using the correct scattering cross-sections?. The three scattering processes of interest are quasi-elastic phonon scattering, elastic Mott scattering and inelastic scattering using the dielectric function model. We have artificially scaled the scattering cross-sections, such that the probability for events associated with a particular model is either increased or decreased. The influence of this adjustment on the calculated SEYs and simulated SEM images is then evaluated. At first we have investigated the influence on the calculated SEY of pure and infinitely thick silicon. We have observed that the influence of the acoustic phonon scattering cross-sections is seen all the way up to the incident primary electron energy of 10 keV. We have extended the analysis to the simulation of SEM images of three dimensional rough lines of PMMA located on a silicon substrate. We conclude that the scaling of the scattering cross-sections affects the contrast of the SEM images, but not the roughness characterization of the lines, i.e. the 3σ of the line edge roughness (LER), correlation length and roughness exponent.

Files

T._Verduin_Sensitivity_of_seco... (pdf)
(pdf | 0.429 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 13-05-2018