Effect of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Configurations on the Acoustic and Psychoacoustic Signatures

Conference Paper (2024)
Author(s)

R.M. Yupa Villanueva (TU Delft - Operations & Environment)

R. Merino Martinez (TU Delft - Operations & Environment)

C.I. Andino Cappagli (TU Delft - Operations & Environment)

A. Altena (TU Delft - Operations & Environment)

M Snellen (TU Delft - Control & Operations)

Research Group
Operations & Environment
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Research Group
Operations & Environment
ISBN (electronic)
978-90-90-39058-1
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Authorities are starting to pay attention not only to the noise levels of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) but also to their quality for acceptance. This manuscript presents a study of four types of propeller-driven UAVs (single-propeller quadcopter, coaxial-propeller quadcopter, quadplane eVTOL (electric vertical take off and landing) and tailsitter eVTOL) to assess their acoustic and psychoacoustic signatures. Experimental outdoor recordings are conducted under realistic flyover conditions. An acoustic analysis showed that quadcopters present higher noise levels compared to the eVTOLs, where the coaxial-propeller configuration revealed to be the noisiest and the quadplane the quietest. A psychoacoustic analysis demonstrated that the coaxial-propeller quadcopter was roughly three times more annoying than its single-propeller counterpart, whereas the quadplane and tailsitter eVTOLs showed similarly lower annoyance values. Additionally, the coaxial-propeller quadcopter exhibited the highest levels of loudness and impulsiveness, while the tailsitter had the lowest. Conversely, the tailsitter exhibited contrasting behavior in terms of sharpness. Regarding tonality, the quadplane was the most tonal, and the tailsitter eVTOL the least. In terms of modulation frequency characteristics, the single-propeller UAV emitted the harshest and most pulsating sound, while the tailsitter had lower values.

Files

License info not available