Multi-material additive manufacturing technologies for Ti-, Mg-, and Fe-based biomaterials for bone substitution

Review (2020)
Author(s)

N.E. Putra (TU Delft - Biomaterials & Tissue Biomechanics)

Mohammad J. Mirzaali Mazandarani (TU Delft - Biomaterials & Tissue Biomechanics)

Julian Apachitei (TU Delft - Biomaterials & Tissue Biomechanics)

Jie Zhou (TU Delft - Biomaterials & Tissue Biomechanics)

A. A. A. Zadpoor (TU Delft - Biomaterials & Tissue Biomechanics)

Research Group
Biomaterials & Tissue Biomechanics
Copyright
© 2020 N.E. Putra, Mohammad J. Mirzaali, I. Apachitei, J. Zhou, A.A. Zadpoor
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.03.037
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Copyright
© 2020 N.E. Putra, Mohammad J. Mirzaali, I. Apachitei, J. Zhou, A.A. Zadpoor
Related content
Research Group
Biomaterials & Tissue Biomechanics
Volume number
109
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The growing interest in multi-functional metallic biomaterials for bone substitutes challenges the current additive manufacturing (AM, =3D printing) technologies. It is foreseeable that advances in multi-material AM for metallic biomaterials will not only allow for complex geometrical designs, but also improve their multi-functionalities by tuning the types or compositions of the underlying base materials, thereby presenting unprecedented opportunities for advanced orthopedic treatments. AM technologies are yet to be extensively explored for the fabrication of multi-functional metallic biomaterials, especially for bone substitutes. The aim of this review is to present the viable options of the state-of-the-art multi-material AM for Ti-, Mg-, and Fe-based biomaterials to be used as bone substitutes. The review starts with a brief review of bone tissue engineering, the design requirements, and fabrication technologies for metallic biomaterials to highlight the advantages of using AM over conventional fabrication methods. Five AM technologies suitable for metal 3D printing are compared against the requirements for multi-material AM. Of these AM technologies, extrusion-based multi-material AM is shown to have the greatest potential to meet the requirements for the fabrication of multi-functional metallic biomaterials. Finally, recent progress in the fabrication of Ti-, Mg-, and Fe-based biomaterials including the utilization of multi-material AM technologies is reviewed so as to identify the knowledge gaps and propose the directions of further research for the development of multi-material AM technologies that are applicable for the fabrication of multi-functional metallic biomaterials.