A storm is coming? Collective sensemaking and ambiguity in an inter-organizational team managing railway system disruptions

Journal Article (2016)
Author(s)

Sander Merkus (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Thijs Willems (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Danny Schipper ( Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam)

Alfons van Marrewijk (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Joop Koppenjan ( Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam)

Marcel Veenswijk (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

HLM Bakker (TU Delft - Integral Design & Management)

Research Group
Integral Design & Management
Copyright
© 2016 Sander Merkus, Thijs Willems, Danny Schipper, Alfons van Marrewijk, Joop Koppenjan, Marcel Veenswijk, H.L.M. Bakker
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2016.1219380
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2016
Language
English
Copyright
© 2016 Sander Merkus, Thijs Willems, Danny Schipper, Alfons van Marrewijk, Joop Koppenjan, Marcel Veenswijk, H.L.M. Bakker
Research Group
Integral Design & Management
Issue number
3
Volume number
17
Pages (from-to)
228-248
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This paper studies the ways in which members of inter-organizational teams collectively make sense of unexpected events and how they decide upon engaging in action. Frequently, ambiguity dominates such change processes aimed to create common understanding. Using the notion of the duality of intrinsic and constructed ambiguity, a detailed analysis of the collective sensemaking efforts of an inter-organizational team of railway coordinators in the Operational Control Center Rail was conducted. Building on team meetings observations during the days preceding a large and potentially disruptive winter storm in December 2013, the case study describes the process of collectively making sense of the disruptiveness of the storm. The findings show that contextual and temporal factors determine whether collective sensemaking unfolds as either a shared or a negotiated process.