Intergenerational transfer of engineering expertise

knowledge continuity management in storm surge barrier engineering

Journal Article (2024)
Author(s)

Merlijn Kamps (TU Delft - Integral Design & Management, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences)

M. van den Boomen (TU Delft - Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences)

Johan A. van den Bogaard (Rijkswaterstaat)

M.J.C.M. Hertogh (TU Delft - Integral Design & Management, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam)

Research Group
Integral Design & Management
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-10-2023-0179
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Research Group
Integral Design & Management
Issue number
6
Volume number
14
Pages (from-to)
874-891
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Purpose: Engineering knowledge continuity is crucial for the life cycle management of long-lived and complex assets, such as nuclear plants, locks and storm surge barriers. At the storm surge barriers in the Netherlands, engineering knowledge continuity is not yet fully assured, despite long-standing efforts. This study aims to explore the relationship between system characteristics, the organizational demarcation of maintenance and operation and the challenges in achieving engineering knowledge continuity and provides suggestions for improvement of theory and policy. Design/methodology/approach: Ten semi-structured interviews were conducted with professionals from various backgrounds in construction, engineering and asset management of the Dutch storm surge barriers, augmented with visits to barriers and barrier teams. A thematic analysis was used to identify and describe the challenges to engineering continuity, their origins and potential solutions. We reviewed knowledge management policy documents and asset management consultancy reports to validate the findings. Additionally, we engaged in frequent interactions with professionals at the barriers. We achieved saturation and validation once no new issues were raised during these discussions. Findings: The thematic analysis developed multiple themes describing the challenges to engineering continuity, their origins and potential solutions. The key findings are that expert engineers are critically important to deal with redesigns induced by obsolescence. Moreover, due to barrier uniqueness, long redesign cycles and reliability requirements, conventional knowledge continuity tools are insufficient to enable new engineers to reach expert level. Finally, the thematic analysis shows that, in some cases, outsourcing should be reduced to facilitate internal learning. Originality/value: The study introduces the application of the knowledge-based view of the firm and the concept of requisite knowledge redundancy to the long-term management of complex assets. It calls for more attention to long gaps in the use of unique knowledge and the effect on knowledge continuity.