Optimizing estimates of annual variations and trends in geocentermotion and J2 from a combination of GRACE data and geophysical models

Journal Article (2016)
Author(s)

Y. Sun (TU Delft - Laboratory Geoscience and Remote Sensing)

R. E.M. Riva (TU Delft - Physical and Space Geodesy)

PG Ditmar (TU Delft - Physical and Space Geodesy)

Research Group
Laboratory Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Copyright
© 2016 Y. Sun, R.E.M. Riva, P.G. Ditmar
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB013073
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2016
Language
English
Copyright
© 2016 Y. Sun, R.E.M. Riva, P.G. Ditmar
Research Group
Laboratory Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Issue number
11
Volume number
121
Pages (from-to)
8352-8370
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The focus of the study is optimizing the technique for estimating geocenter motion and variations in J2 by combining data from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite mission with output from an Ocean Bottom Pressure model and a Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) model. First, we conduct an end-to-end numerical simulation study. We generate input time-variable gravity field observations by perturbing a synthetic Earth model with realistically simulated errors. We show that it is important to avoid large errors at short wavelengths and signal leakage from land to ocean, as well as to account for self-attraction and loading effects. Second, the optimal implementation strategy is applied to real GRACE data. We show that the estimates of annual amplitude in geocenter motion are in line with estimates from other techniques, such as satellite laser ranging (SLR) and global GPS inversion. At the same time, annual amplitudes of C10 and C11 are increased by about 50% and 20%, respectively, compared to estimates based on Swenson et al. (2008). Estimates of J2 variations are by about 15% larger than SLR results in terms of annual amplitude. Linear trend estimates are dependent on the adopted GIA model but still comparable to some SLR results.

Files

2016_Sun_et_al_JGR.pdf
(pdf | 4.14 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 09-05-2017
License info not available