Exploratory assessment of a combined-cycle engine concept for aircraft propulsion

Conference paper (2017)

Authors

C.M. de Servi Flight Performance and Propulsion - Aerospace Engineering
L. Azzini Flight Performance and Propulsion - Aerospace Engineering
M. Pini Flight Performance and Propulsion - Aerospace Engineering
Piero Colonna Flight Performance and Propulsion - Aerospace Engineering
Research Group
Flight Performance and Propulsion (Aerospace Engineering) (TU Delft)
Copyright: © 2017 C.M. de Servi, L. Azzini, M. Pini, Piero Colonna
More Info
expand_more

Published Date

2017

Language

English

Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Faculty

Aerospace Engineering

Department

Flow Physics and Technology

Research Group

Flight Performance and Propulsion

Abstract

This preliminary study considers a combined cycle configu­ration for aeroengines, whereby thermal energy from the exhaust of the gas turbine is partly recovered in order to obtain additional mechanical power. The waste heat recovery system is based on a closed thermodynamic bottoming cycle with supercritical car­ bon dioxide (scCO2) as working fluid, allowing to achieve a very high power density. As first step of the investigation a thermo­dynamic cycle analysis of the combined-cycle engine (CCE) is carried out. Results are compared to those of the intercooled­recuperative engine (IRE) configuration for the same operating conditions and calculated under the same modeling assumptions. The estimated nominal SFC of the proposed CCE configuration is approximately 20% lower compared to that of a conventional turbofan, and 6% lower than that of the IRE, if pressure drops in the heat exchangers are neglected. Such large gain justified further analysis, by including the preliminary sizing of main components. Once the sizing of heat exchangers is factored in, the thermodynamic benefit of the CCE is offset by the penalty due to the weight of the additional equip­ment. This is mainly caused by i) the space constraints of the turbofan nacelle, which strongly limit the recoverable thermal power, and ii) the lack of proper het exchanger technology for such a highly unconventional application. These issues, and the many other that need consideration, will be addressed in an upcoming research project encompassing a much wider scope involving new aircraft and propulsion system