Forms of privatization in Dutch urban development
From unsolicited proposals to private quality safeguarding
E.W.T.M. Heurkens (TU Delft - Urban Development Management)
W.C.T.F. de Zeeuw (TU Delft - Practice Chair Urban Area Development)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
An unsolicited private proposal, a flexible masterplan and land-use plan, a quality team that overtakes the role of the public aesthetics commission, and private quality safeguarding for plan judgement and construction supervision. These instruments and agreements are used by housing association De Alliantie, the Municipality of Amsterdam, and other parties in the urban development project Theo Koomenbuurt on Zeeburgereiland. These agreements are exemplary for a gradual shift towards privatization in Dutch urban development practice. This article identifies the case-specific characteristics of and the actor experiences with these market-oriented instruments. In addition, it draws lessons for Dutch development practice: do these instruments result in process acceleration, cost efficiency, and balanced spatial quality?