Shared micromobility and public transport integration - A mode choice study using stated preference data

Journal Article (2023)
Author(s)

Alejandro Montes (Student TU Delft)

Nejc Geržinic (TU Delft - Transport and Planning)

WW Veeneman (TU Delft - Organisation & Governance)

Niels van Van Oort (TU Delft - Transport and Planning)

Serge Hoogendoorn (TU Delft - Transport and Planning)

Transport and Planning
Copyright
© 2023 Alejandro Montes, N. Geržinič, Wijnand Veeneman, N. van Oort, S.P. Hoogendoorn
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2023.101302
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Copyright
© 2023 Alejandro Montes, N. Geržinič, Wijnand Veeneman, N. van Oort, S.P. Hoogendoorn
Transport and Planning
Volume number
99
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This paper uses stated preference data collected in the city of Rotterdam and discrete choice modelling techniques to study the relationship between public transport and shared micromobility. It assumes a hypothetical condition of integrated systems and studies the relationships of complement and competition between these modes. The findings suggest that shared micromobility modes are viable alternatives as egress modes for metro trips. Shared micromobility can be seen as a complement to metro, yet shared e-mopeds proved to also be a viable option as individual modes for long-distance trips. Different characteristics proved to be important in choices in this context: frequency of public transport use, previous use of shared micromobility, and age. Considering the results obtained, collaboration between shared micromobility and transit operators might benefit them as well as travellers. Collaborations should be designed so that they help travellers to decrease total travel time, even if it implies longer egress legs. However, the costs of these shared modes should not be as high as to prevent travellers to use them as egress alternatives. Finally, young travellers and frequent transit users could be specifically targeted, as they showed to have a better perception of shared micromobility.