Tackling inter-subject variability in smartwatch data using factorization models

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

A. Naseri Jahfari (HagaZiekenhuis, TU Delft - Pattern Recognition and Bioinformatics)

David Tax (TU Delft - Pattern Recognition and Bioinformatics)

Ivo van der Bilt (HagaZiekenhuis)

Marcel J T Reinders (TU Delft - Pattern Recognition and Bioinformatics)

Research Group
Pattern Recognition and Bioinformatics
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-12102-7
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Pattern Recognition and Bioinformatics
Issue number
1
Volume number
15
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Smartwatches enable longitudinal and continuous data acquisition. This has the potential to remotely monitor (changes) of the health of users. However, differences among subjects (inter-subject variability) limit a model to generalize to unseen subjects. This study focused on binary classification tasks using heart rate and step counter from smartwatches, including night/day and inactive/active classification, as well as sleep and SpO2-related (oxygen saturation) tasks. To address inter-subject variability, we explored different transforming and normalization regimes for time series including per-subject and population-based strategies. We propose a modified factorized autoencoder, which separates the data into two latent spaces capturing class-specific and subject-specific information. Our proposed generalized factorized autoencoder and triplet factorized autoencoder improved classification accuracy over the baseline from 74.8 (± 10.5) to 83.1 (± 5.1) and 83.4 (± 5.3), respectively, for night/day classification, gains for inactive/active classification were modest, improving from 84.3 (± 9.4) to 86.9 (± 4.4) and 86.6 (± 4.3), respectively. Our study highlights challenges of handling inter-subject variability in smartwatch data and how factorization models can be used to enable more robust and personalized health monitoring solutions for diverse populations.