Aerodynamic Benefits of Camber Morphing Technology for Strut-Braced Wing Configurations

Conference Paper (2025)
Author(s)

I. Tsatsas (TU Delft - Group De Breuker, TU Delft - Arts & Crafts)

E. Sticchi (TU Delft - Wind Energy)

X. Córcoles (TU Delft - Group Sodja)

Roeland de Breuker (TU Delft - Group De Breuker)

Jurij Sodja (TU Delft - Group Sodja)

Research Group
Group De Breuker
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2025-0281
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Group De Breuker
ISBN (electronic)
978-1-62410-723-8
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This study investigates the aerodynamic benefits of integrating trailing edge camber morphing on the strut of a regional strut-braced wing aircraft designed to cruise at Mach number of 0.5. Strut-braced wings are recognized for their weight advantages in high aspect ratio designs compared to the equivalent cantilever wings since the strut decreases the main wing’s bending moment. Hence, the induced drag component can be reduced due to the high aspect ratio without increasing the weight of the main wing. However, the strut increases the parasite drag component highlighting the need for innovative methods to improve the strut-braced wing overall aerodynamic efficiency. Recent studies have shown the significance of strut shape in the overall drag reduction and the necessity of maintaining high aerodynamic efficiency in off-design conditions. In this work, a genetic algorithm was utilized in conjunction with a mid-fidelity aerodynamic model to optimize the morphing strut trailing edge geometry across a range of climb and cruise conditions. The optimization objective was the minimization of drag and the design variables were the equivalent trailing edge deflection angles in seven sections of the strut. The results demonstrate a drag reduction of 0.5% to 3% both in climb and cruise. For lift coefficients below 0.8, the drag reduction is mainly attributed to the redistribution of the loading and the induced drag component reduction. In contrast, at lift coefficients above 0.8, the parasite drag component decreases due to the increased region of laminar flow over the upper wing surface.

Files

License info not available