Experimental evaluation of a morphing leading edge concept

Journal Article (2019)
Author(s)

J Sodja (TU Delft - Aerospace Structures & Computational Mechanics)

M.J. Martinez (TU Delft - Structural Integrity & Composites, Clarkson University)

John C. Simpson (Fraunhofer-Institut für Bauphysik)

Roeland De de Breuker (TU Delft - Aerospace Structures & Computational Mechanics)

Research Group
Aerospace Structures & Computational Mechanics
Copyright
© 2019 J. Sodja, M.J. Martinez, John C. Simpson, R. De Breuker
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X19862369
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Copyright
© 2019 J. Sodja, M.J. Martinez, John C. Simpson, R. De Breuker
Research Group
Aerospace Structures & Computational Mechanics
Issue number
18-19
Volume number
30
Pages (from-to)
2953-2969
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This article presents an experimental evaluation of a morphing leading edge demonstrator by investigating its morphed shape, the level of induced strains in the airfoil skin, the actuation force, and the morphing mechanism’s capability to lock and transfer the applied loads. In addition, a finite element model of the demonstrator is assembled comprising an elastic morphing skin and a kinematic morphing mechanism. The obtained results are used to assess whether the demonstrator performs according to the design objectives, such as the target shape, the character of the morphing deformation and the morphing mechanism locking, applied during the design process. The comparison between experimental and numerical results yielded a good agreement in terms of observed morphed shape and pertaining strains. The average difference in morphed shape was less than 0.08% chord at the maximum actuator extension. The observed difference in the respective strains was less than 400 micro-strains. A significant difference, up to 70%, was observed in the actuation force, which was attributed to the modelling assumptions and to the force measurement technique employed in the experiment. Nevertheless, both results show good qualitative agreement showing similar trends.