Shantytown redevelopment projects

State-led redevelopment of declining neighbourhoods under market transition in Shenyang, China

Journal Article (2018)
Author(s)

Xin Li (Chinese Academy of Sciences, TU Delft - OLD Urban Renewal and Housing)

R.J. Kleinhans (TU Delft - OLD Urban Renewal and Housing)

M. van Ham (University of St Andrews, TU Delft - OLD Urban Renewal and Housing)

Research Group
OLD Urban Renewal and Housing
Copyright
© 2018 X. Li, R.J. Kleinhans, M. van Ham
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.016
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Copyright
© 2018 X. Li, R.J. Kleinhans, M. van Ham
Research Group
OLD Urban Renewal and Housing
Volume number
73
Pages (from-to)
106-116
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Since 1978, market transition in China has significantly influenced the roles of the state, the market and the residents in urban restructuring. Since 2008, the central government has initiated Shantytown Redevelopment Projects (SRPs) to improve the living conditions of low-income residents. Between 2008 and 2012, about 12.6 million households were involved in SRPs, and forced to move as their dwellings were demolished. This paper investigates how SRPs are implemented by revealing how different stakeholders interact in SRPs in the city of Shenyang, China. Through in-depth interviews with various stakeholders and analysis of policy documentation on SRPs, the paper reveals a complex interplay between different stakeholders, which is characterized by the centralization of the inception of SRPs, the decentralization of actual SRP implementation, changes in the role of market forces, and decreasing housing affordability and multiple deprivation of residents in SRP target areas. Various stakeholders have consensus on the need for improving the living conditions in deprived neighbourhoods and on boosting the housing market. However, conflicts arise due to frictions between the central and local governments regarding the implementation of SRPs. We also find evidence of an entrepreneurial paradox in the relationship between local governments and developers. Finally, a mismatch occurs between the scope of the SRP policy and residents' attempts to improve their socioeconomic situation.

Files

1_s2.0_S0264275117303578_main.... (pdf)
(pdf | 1.51 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 01-05-2018
License info not available