A comprehensive MRI-based computational model of blood flow in compliant aorta using radial basis function interpolation
R. Perinajová (TU Delft - ChemE/Transport Phenomena, TU Delft - J.M. Burgers Center for Fluid Mechanics)
Thijn van de Ven (Student TU Delft)
Elise Roelse (Student TU Delft)
F. Xu (TU Delft - ChemE/Transport Phenomena, TU Delft - J.M. Burgers Center for Fluid Mechanics)
Joe Juffermans (Leiden University Medical Center)
J.J.M. Westenberg (Leiden University Medical Center)
Hildo Lamb (Leiden University Medical Center)
S. Kenjeres (TU Delft - J.M. Burgers Center for Fluid Mechanics, TU Delft - ChemE/Transport Phenomena)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Background
Properly understanding the origin and progression of the thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) can help prevent its growth and rupture. For a better understanding of this pathogenesis, the aortic blood flow has to be studied and interpreted in great detail. We can obtain detailed aortic blood flow information using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) with a prescribed motion of the aortic wall.
Methods
We performed two different types of simulations—static (rigid wall) and dynamic (moving wall) for healthy control and a patient with a TAA. For the latter, we have developed a novel morphing approach based on the radial basis function (RBF) interpolation of the segmented 4D-flow MRI geometries at different time instants. Additionally, we have applied reconstructed 4D-flow MRI velocity profiles at the inlet with an automatic registration protocol.
Results
The simulated RBF-based movement of the aorta matched well with the original 4D-flow MRI geometries. The wall movement was most dominant in the ascending aorta, accompanied by the highest variation of the blood flow patterns. The resulting data indicated significant differences between the dynamic and static simulations, with a relative difference for the patient of 7.47±14.18% in time-averaged wall shear stress and 15.97±43.32% in the oscillatory shear index (for the whole domain).
Conclusions
In conclusion, the RBF-based morphing approach proved to be numerically accurate and computationally efficient in capturing complex kinematics of the aorta, as validated by 4D-flow MRI. We recommend this approach for future use in MRI-based CFD simulations in broad population studies. Performing these would bring a better understanding of the onset and growth of TAA.
help_outline