Path creation as a discursive process

A study of discussion starters in the field of solar fuels

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Eugen Popa (TU Delft - Ethics & Philosophy of Technology)

Vincent Blok (Wageningen University & Research)

Cornelius Schubert (Technische Uni­ver­si­tät Dort­mund)

Georgios Katsoukis (University of Twente)

Research Group
Ethics & Philosophy of Technology
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127241271024
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Ethics & Philosophy of Technology
Issue number
1
Volume number
55
Pages (from-to)
62-84
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

When a technology is seen as the right solution to a recognized problem, the development of alternative technologies comes under threat. To secure much-needed resources, proponents of alternative technologies must, in these conditions, restart societal discussion on the status quo, a process at once technological and discursive known as ‘path creation’. In this article, we investigate discussion-restarting strategies employed by supporters of emerging technologies in the field of solar fuels, particularly the advocates of a technology referred to as ‘artificial photosynthesis’. For illustrative purposes we explore four such strategies: revisiting weak spots, resizing the problem, redefining the game, and renegotiating labels. We conclude with a methodological reflection on the empirical study of discursive strategies in a socio-technical system. We further suggest a more systematic application of discourse-analytical and argumentation-theoretical insights that can complement current scholarship on path dependence and path creation.