Impacts of replacing a fixed public transport line by a demand responsive transport system

Case study of a rural area in Amsterdam

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

Felipe Mariz Coutinho (External organisation)

Niels van Oort (TU Delft - Transport and Planning)

Zoi Christoforou (Gustave Eiffel University)

María J. Alonso-González (TU Delft - Transport and Planning)

Oded Cats (TU Delft - Transport and Planning)

SP Hoogendoorn (TU Delft - Transport and Planning)

Transport and Planning
Copyright
© 2020 Felipe Mariz Coutinho, N. van Oort, Zoi Christoforou, M.J. Alonso González, O. Cats, S.P. Hoogendoorn
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2020.100910
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Copyright
© 2020 Felipe Mariz Coutinho, N. van Oort, Zoi Christoforou, M.J. Alonso González, O. Cats, S.P. Hoogendoorn
Transport and Planning
Volume number
83
Pages (from-to)
1-11
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The diffusion of the smartphone and the urban sprawl is pushing both private and public actors to revisit the concept of demand-responsive transport (DRT). This paper provides a historical overview of DRT experiences, understanding their pros and cons. In addition, it presents the case study of Mokumflex, a 12-month DRT pilot program that replaced the regular bus service in low-density areas of Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Based on a close collaboration with the private enterprise that operated the service and also with the local bus operator, we performed an empirical before and after comparison. These insights help to understand the impacts of DRT systems and support (future) design of DRT and public transport. A set of indicators was chosen for the intermodal comparison: travel distances, ridership, costs, Greenhouse Gases (GHG), emissions and population's perception. Ridership dropped from 78.1 passengers/day to 15.9 passengers/day, however, for being “demand-tailored”, passenger-km reduced even more, going from 1252.8 km/day to 136.6 km/day, hence reducing the costs and GHG emissions per passenger. In regards to population's perception, the system enjoyed a good evaluation.