High-resolution large-scale onshore wind energy assessments

A review of potential definitions, methodologies and future research needs

Review (2022)
Author(s)

Russell McKenna (University of Aberdeen, ETH Zürich)

Stefan Pfenninger (TU Delft - Energy and Industry, ETH Zürich)

Heidi Heinrichs (Forschungszentrum Jülich)

Johannes Schmidt (BOKU-University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences)

Iain Staffell (Imperial College London)

Christian Bauer (Paul Scherrer Institut)

Katharina Gruber (BOKU-University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences)

Andrea N. Hahmann (Technical University of Denmark (DTU))

Malte Jansen (Imperial College London)

Michael Klingler (BOKU-University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences)

Natascha Landwehr (Forschungszentrum Jülich)

Xiaoli Guo Larsén (Technical University of Denmark (DTU))

Johan Lilliestam (Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies)

Bryn Pickering (ETH Zürich)

Martin Robinius (Forschungszentrum Jülich)

Tim Tröndle (Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies, ETH Zürich)

Olga Turkovska (BOKU-University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences)

Sebastian Wehrle (BOKU-University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences)

Jann Michael Weinand (Karlsruhe Institut für Technologie)

Jan Wohland (ETH Zürich)

Research Group
Energy and Industry
Copyright
© 2022 Russell McKenna, Stefan Pfenninger, Heidi Heinrichs, Johannes Schmidt, Iain Staffell, Christian Bauer, Katharina Gruber, Andrea N. Hahmann, Malte Jansen, Michael Klingler, Natascha Landwehr, Xiaoli Guo Larsén, Johan Lilliestam, Bryn Pickering, Martin Robinius, Tim Tröndle, Olga Turkovska, Sebastian Wehrle, Jann Michael Weinand, Jan Wohland
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.027
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 Russell McKenna, Stefan Pfenninger, Heidi Heinrichs, Johannes Schmidt, Iain Staffell, Christian Bauer, Katharina Gruber, Andrea N. Hahmann, Malte Jansen, Michael Klingler, Natascha Landwehr, Xiaoli Guo Larsén, Johan Lilliestam, Bryn Pickering, Martin Robinius, Tim Tröndle, Olga Turkovska, Sebastian Wehrle, Jann Michael Weinand, Jan Wohland
Research Group
Energy and Industry
Volume number
182
Pages (from-to)
659-684
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The rapid uptake of renewable energy technologies in recent decades has increased the demand of energy researchers, policymakers and energy planners for reliable data on the spatial distribution of their costs and potentials. For onshore wind energy this has resulted in an active research field devoted to analysing these resources for regions, countries or globally. A particular thread of this research attempts to go beyond purely technical or spatial restrictions and determine the realistic, feasible or actual potential for wind energy. Motivated by these developments, this paper reviews methods and assumptions for analysing geographical, technical, economic and, finally, feasible onshore wind potentials. We address each of these potentials in turn, including aspects related to land eligibility criteria, energy meteorology, and technical developments of wind turbine characteristics such as power density, specific rotor power and spacing aspects. Economic aspects of potential assessments are central to future deployment and are discussed on a turbine and system level covering levelized costs depending on locations, and the system integration costs which are often overlooked in such analyses. Non-technical approaches include scenicness assessments of the landscape, constraints due to regulation or public opposition, expert and stakeholder workshops, willingness to pay/accept elicitations and socioeconomic cost-benefit studies. For each of these different potential estimations, the state of the art is critically discussed, with an attempt to derive best practice recommendations and highlight avenues for future research.