The resistance of a slip-critical steel-to-steel connection including preloading and/or injection

Master thesis (2023)

Authors

I.H. Derks Civil Engineering & Geosciences

Contributors

P.A. de Vries Steel & Composite Structures - CEG (supervisor 1)
M.P. Nijgh Rijkswaterstaat (supervisor 1)
S.H.J. van Es (supervisor 1)
M. Veljkovic Steel & Composite Structures - CEG (supervisor 2)
Lambertus J. Sluys Materials- Mechanics- Management & Design (supervisor 1)
Faculty
Civil Engineering & Geosciences
Copyright: © 2023 Ivo Derks
Preloaded and injected bolted connection Shear connection Slip resistance
More Info
expand_more

Published Date

06-12-2023

Language

English

Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Faculty

Civil Engineering & Geosciences

Abstract

Both preloaded and injected bolted connections are commonly used in steel bridges in The Netherlands. Where preloaded bolted connections are already used for a longer time, the injection of bolt holes is a method used from the 1970s onwards. Injection of bolts became a good alternative for the replacement of riveted connections. This injection increases the slip resistance of the connection by filling the clearance between the bolt and the plate. Combining both methods increases the slip resistance of a bolted connection and is therefore even more beneficial.
According to the standard NEN-EN1993-1-8 [17], it is safe to assume that the resistance of a preloaded and injected bolted connection is equal to the sum of the two individual obtained resistances from preloading and injection. The aim of this research is to validate this statement and thus investigate the resistance of a slip-critical steel-to-steel connection including preloading and/or injection.

The study addresses this manner through both experiments and numerical analysis, addressing all three types of connections. In addition, this potential of summation is considered for two different levels of preloading, implementing plastic and elastic preload preloading. These levels of preloading were considered for two reasons, embodying different applications and identifying the effect of the preload force on the resistance. Each experiment is based on a short-term testing method that is in compliance with the described method of the EN1090-2. These resistances are verified by a numerical analysis with the goal of gaining more insight into the behaviour of the connection and validation of the obtained results.

From both experimental and numerical results, it is concluded that a summation of the individual resistances overestimates the actual resistance of a preloaded and injected bolted connection when measuring at the edge of the plates. This overestimation is similar for both preload levels.
Based on these results, it is concluded that it is unsafe to assume that the resistance of a preloaded and injected bolted connection is equal to the sum of the individual resistances obtained from preloading and injection. However, this conclusion might change if a different criterion for measuring relative displacements at specific locations is implemented.

The resistance of a connection is defined at a fixed magnitude of relative displacement measured at the edge of the plate, assuming that this is representing the displacement of the bolt. However, it turned out that the assumed limit displacement of 0.15mm did not result in the same displacement at the bolt(group) for all connections due to the amount of preload force and the geometry of the plates. Therefore, it is recommended to investigate the sensibility of the measured displacements for different geometries of and preload levels in the connection.