Using the slice rank for finding upper bounds on the size of cap sets

Bachelor Thesis (2018)
Author(s)

S.J. Borst (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Contributor(s)

Dion Gijswijt – Mentor

Faculty
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science
Copyright
© 2018 Sander Borst
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Copyright
© 2018 Sander Borst
Graduation Date
15-01-2018
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Faculty
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The cap set problem consists of finding the maximum size cap sets, i.e. sets without a 3-term arithmetic progression in F₃. In this thesis several known results on the behavior of this number as n → ∞ are presented. In particular we discuss a reformulation by Terence Tao and Will Sawin of a proof found by Dion Gijswijt and Jordan Ellenberg. It uses the slice rank, a rank that is defined for elements of tensor products, to give upper bounds on the size of the cap sets. In this report we will explain the slice rank and how it is related to the size of cap sets. We will also explore whether the slice rank might be used for bounding the size of arithmetic progression-free sets in F_q for q ≠ 3. We show that we can not use the slice rank to give a non-trivial upper bound on the size of n-term progression-free sets for n ≥ 7. This was already known for n ≥ 8.

Files

License info not available