Replicating cohesive and stress-history-dependent behavior of bulk solids

Feasibility and definiteness in DEM calibration procedure

Journal Article (2021)
Author(s)

M. Mohajeri (TU Delft - Transport Engineering and Logistics)

Cees Van Rhee (TU Delft - Offshore and Dredging Engineering, TU Delft - Rivers, Ports, Waterways and Dredging Engineering)

DL Schott (TU Delft - Transport Engineering and Logistics)

Research Group
Transport Engineering and Logistics
Copyright
© 2021 M. Mohajeri, C. van Rhee, D.L. Schott
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2021.02.044
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2021
Language
English
Copyright
© 2021 M. Mohajeri, C. van Rhee, D.L. Schott
Research Group
Transport Engineering and Logistics
Issue number
5
Volume number
32
Pages (from-to)
1532-1548
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This paper presents a multi-step DEM calibration procedure for cohesive solid materials, incorporating feasibility in finding a non-empty solution space and definiteness in capturing bulk responses independently of calibration targets. Our procedure follows four steps: (I) feasibility; (II) screening of DEM variables; (III) surrogate modeling-based optimization; and (IV) verification. Both types of input parameter, continuous (e.g. coefficient of static friction) and categorical (e.g. contact module), can be used in our calibration procedure. The cohesive and stress-history-dependent behavior of a moist iron ore sample is replicated using experimental data from four different laboratory tests, such as a ring shear test. This results in a high number of bulk responses (i.e. ≥ 4) as calibration targets in combination with a high number of significant DEM input variables (i.e. > 2) in the calibration procedure. Coefficient of static friction, surface energy, and particle shear modulus are found to be the most significant continuous variables for the simulated processes. The optimal DEM parameter set and its definiteness are verified using 20 different bulk response values. The multi-step optimization framework thus can be used to calibrate material models when both a high number of input variables (i.e. > 2) and a high number of calibration targets (i.e. ≥ 4) are involved.