The g-Strained EPR Line Shape of Transition-Ion Complexes and Metalloproteins

Abstract

Analysis of the EPR of dilute transition-ion complexes and metalloproteins in random phases, such as frozen solutions, powders, glasses, and gels, requires a model for the spectral ‘powder’ shape. Such a model comprises a description of the line shape and the linewidth of individual molecules as well as a notion of their physical origin. Spectral features sharpen up with decreasing temperature until the limit of constant linewidth of inhomogeneous broadening. At and below this temperature limit, each molecule has a linewidth that slightly differs from those of its congeners, and which is not related in a simple way to lifetime broadening. Choice of the model not only affects precise assignment of g-values, but also concentration determination (‘spin counting’), and therefore, calculation of stoichiometries in multi-center complexes. Forty years ago, the theoretically and experimentally well-founded statistical theory of g-strain was developed as a prime model for EPR powder patterns. In the intervening years until today, this model was universally ignored in favor of models that are incompatible with physical reality, resulting in many mistakes in EPR spectral interpretation. The purpose of this review is to outline the differences between the models, to reveal where analyses went astray, and thus to turn a very long standstill in EPR powder shape understanding into a new start towards proper methodology.