Bayesian networks for identifying incorrect probabilistic intuitions in a climate trend uncertainty quantification context

Journal Article (2018)
Author(s)

A.M. Hanea (University of Melbourne)

G.F. Nane (TU Delft - Applied Probability)

B.A. Wielicki (NASA Langley Research Center)

R.M. Cooke (Resources for the Future)

Research Group
Applied Probability
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2018.1437059
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Research Group
Applied Probability
Bibliographical Note
Accepted Author Manuscript@en
Pages (from-to)
1-16
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Probabilistic thinking can often be unintuitive. This is the case even for simple problems, let alone the more complex ones arising in climate modelling, where disparate information sources need to be combined. The physical models, the natural variability of systems, the measurement errors and their dependence upon the observational period length should be modelled together in order to understand the intricacies of the underlying processes. We use Bayesian networks (BNs) to connect all the above-mentioned pieces in a climate trend uncertainty quantification framework. Inference in such models allows us to observe some seemingly nonsensical outcomes. We argue that they must be pondered rather than discarded until we understand how they arise. We would like to stress that the main focus of this paper is the use of BNs in complex probabilistic settings rather than the application itself.

Files

43042021.pdf
(pdf | 0.882 Mb)
License info not available