Experimental Characterization of Upper Trailing Edge Flaps for Transonic Buffet Control

Journal Article (2022)
Author(s)

Alessandro D'Aguanno (TU Delft - Aerodynamics)

F.F.J. Schrijer (TU Delft - Aerodynamics)

B. W. Oudheusden (TU Delft - Aerodynamics)

Research Group
Aerodynamics
Copyright
© 2022 A. D'Aguanno, F.F.J. Schrijer, B.W. van Oudheusden
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-022-00381-3
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 A. D'Aguanno, F.F.J. Schrijer, B.W. van Oudheusden
Research Group
Aerodynamics
Issue number
2
Volume number
110
Pages (from-to)
325-350
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This experimental study investigates the possibility of controlling transonic buffet by means of a trailing edge flap with an upward deflection (referred to as “upper trailing edge flap”, or: UTEF). Different geometries (straight and serrated) and dimensions of UTEFs (with heights ranging between 1 and 2% of the chord) have been studied with respect to their impact on the buffet behavior. The effectiveness of the UTEFs has been investigated with schlieren and particle image velocimetry (PIV) in the transonic-supersonic wind tunnel of TU Delft at Ma = 0.70, α = 3.5°. The schlieren results demonstrated the efficacy of the use of UTEFs for reducing the range of the buffet oscillations when the height of the UTEF was equal to at least 1.5%c. This result was corroborated by a flow characterization with PIV data and which highlighted that, in presence of a control system, not only the shock oscillation range is reduced but also the intensity of the separated area pulsation. The use of serrated UTEFs, despite having an effect on the local flow field, was found to be ineffective in alleviating buffet oscillations. The adoption of the best behaving UTEF configuration (straight 2%c UTEF) proved to only slightly alter the circulation value compared to the clean configuration, while it also proved to be effective in an off-buffet condition (Ma = 0.74 and α = 2.5°).