Reducing Manual Labour in Forensic Microtrace Recognition with Deep Learning
G.M. Rijpkema (TU Delft - Mechanical Engineering)
C.S. Smith – Mentor (TU Delft - Applied Sciences)
D. Kalisvaart – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Mechanical Engineering)
S. Korovin – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Mechanical Engineering)
Jaap van der Weerd – Mentor (Nederlands Forensisch Instituut (NFI))
Holger Caesar – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Mechanical Engineering)
A. Jakobi – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Applied Sciences)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Forensic microtrace investigation relies on a time- and labour-intensive process of manually analysing samples via microscopy. To aid forensic experts in their investigations, an image recognition model for microtrace localisation and classification is needed. This work investigates the trace recognition accuracy that can be achieved by analysing images captured with automated microscopy through deep learning. Fibres, hairs, skin, glass and sand are pixel-wise classified in microscopy scans of tape-lift samples. As deep learning requires extensive amounts of annotated training data, pretraining is investigated to minimise the required annotation workload. ImageNet pretraining, pretraining with self-supervised learning and a sequential application of these approaches are tested. It is found that pretrained models are able to reduce the required annotated data twofold compared to models trained from scratch, while retaining the prediction accuracy. While the ImageNet-pretrained models outperform the self-supervised-pretrained models, the highest accuracy is achieved by combining the two approaches. With this, traces are recognised with a mean intersection over union of 0.56 when training on only 2.2 dm2 of annotated tape lift scans.