Impact of spacing and pruning on quantity, quality and economics of Douglas-fir sawn timber

scenario and sensitivity analysis

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

Andreas Rais (Technische Universität München)

Werner Poschenrieder (Technische Universität München)

Jan Willem G van de Kuilen (TU Delft - Bio-based Structures & Materials, Holzforschung München)

Hans Pretzsch (Technische Universität München)

Research Group
Bio-based Structures & Materials
Copyright
© 2020 Andreas Rais, Werner Poschenrieder, J.W.G. van de Kuilen, Hans Pretzsch
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-020-01282-8
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Copyright
© 2020 Andreas Rais, Werner Poschenrieder, J.W.G. van de Kuilen, Hans Pretzsch
Research Group
Bio-based Structures & Materials
Issue number
5
Volume number
139
Pages (from-to)
747-758
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Controlling the long-term effect of management on the quantity and properties of individual boards is a fundamental challenge for silviculture. Within this basic study on Douglas-fir, we have investigated the sensitivity of the net present value (NPV) to three most common planting densities and a prominent pruning strategy. We therefore have applied an individual tree growth model, which represents intrinsic stem structure as a result of crown competition. The model extrapolated board strength development to the rotational age of 70 years, starting from real and comprehensive data recorded from experimental Douglas-fir plots at the age of 20 years. Total volume production increased from about 1600 m3 ha−1 for 1000 and 2000 trees ha−1 to 1800 m3 ha−1 for 4000 trees ha−1. The economic superiority of the lowest density stands increased considering the NPV at inflation-adjusted interest rates of 0%, 2% and 4%: Given an interest rate of 2% and no pruning, the NPV at 2000 was at about 50% of the one at 1000 trees ha−1. The NPV at 4000 trees ha−1 was even negative. Generally, artificial pruning was not effective. The revealed financial trade-off between growth and timber quality in young stands underlines the importance of silvicultural guidelines, which quantify the effect of management on yield per strength class and financial outcome.