A data-based comparison of BN-HRA models in assessing human error probability
An offshore evacuation case study
S. Abrishami (Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, TU Delft - Safety and Security Science)
Nima Khakzad (Toronto Metropolitan University)
Seyed Mahmoud Hosseini (Ferdowsi University of Mashhad)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Bayesian Network (BN) has been increasingly exploited to improve different aspects of Human Reliability Analysis (HRA), resulting in a new generation of HRA techniques, known as BN-HRA models. However, validating and evaluating the accuracy of BN-HRA models is still a challenging task. In this study, we have assessed and compared the performance of some of well-known BN-HRA techniques using human performance data obtained from an offshore evacuation simulation. Based on the role of data in quantifying the BN-HRA models, three categories of BN-HRA models have been considered: (i) BN-CREAM and BN-SPARH, which are based on predefined rules (rule-based methods), (ii) Bayesian Parameter Learning (BPL), which is entirely based on the available data (data-based method), and (iii) BN-SLIM model which is based on both the available data and the predefined rules (hybrid method). The results of the present study show that the data-based methods, i.e., BN-SLIM and BPL, in general outperform the rule-based methods. Cross-validation analysis further demonstrates the superiority of BN-SLIM over BPL, particularly in case of data scarcity.
help_outline