Advanced downstream processing of bioethanol from syngas fermentation

Journal Article (2023)
Author(s)

T. Jankovic (TU Delft - BT/Bioprocess Engineering)

Adrie J.J. Straathof (TU Delft - BT/Bioprocess Engineering)

A.A. Kiss (TU Delft - ChemE/Product and Process Engineering)

Research Group
ChemE/Product and Process Engineering
Copyright
© 2023 T.J. Jankovic, Adrie J.J. Straathof, A.A. Kiss
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2023.124320
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Copyright
© 2023 T.J. Jankovic, Adrie J.J. Straathof, A.A. Kiss
Research Group
ChemE/Product and Process Engineering
Volume number
322
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Syngas fermentation is used industrially to produce diluted bioethanol (about 1–6 wt%). This research study proposes a novel downstream process that recovers bioethanol in an energy-efficient and cost-effective manner, improves fermentation yield by recycling all fermentation broth components (microbes, acetate and water), and is designed for full-scale industrial-level application. Therefore, vacuum distillation at fermentation temperature was conceptually studied as an initial ethanol recovery step, leading to a bottom stream that may be recycled. Advanced separation and purification techniques were designed to recover 99.5% of initially present ethanol as high-purity product (99.8 wt%). Mechanical vapor recompression and heat integration methods were used to maximize sustainability and eco-efficiency of the proposed recovery process. Implementation of these techniques on a process using 6 wt% ethanol feed stream decreased the total annual costs by 54.2% (from 0.175 to 0.080 $/kgEtOH), reduced the primary energy requirement by 66.1% (from 2.82 to 0.96 kWthh/kgEtOH), lowered the CO2 emission by up to 82.6% (from 0.414 to 0.072 kgCO2/kgEtOH), and reduced the fresh water usage by 62.6% (from 0.242 to 0.091 m3W/kgEtOH). Sensitivity analysis for ethanol concentrations ranging from 6 to 1 wt% showed that the recovery costs and energy use increased to 0.336 $/kgEtOH and 1.78 kWthh/kgEtOH respectively. Since ethanol recovery performs better but fermentation will perform worse at higher ethanol concentration in fermentation broth, there is a trade-off concentration for the overall process. The current analysis is an important step toward determining this trade-off.