The Development of a Cartilage Specific Bioink for Three-Dimensional Bioprinting

Master thesis (2021)

Authors

E.L. Kingma Mechanical Engineering

Contributors

P.J. Diaz Payno Biomaterials & Tissue Biomechanics - Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering (supervisor 1)
E.L. Fratila-Apachitei Biomaterials & Tissue Biomechanics - Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering (supervisor 1)
Faculty
Mechanical Engineering
Copyright: © 2021 Esther Kingma
More Info
expand_more

Published Date

28-07-2021

Language

English

Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Faculty

Mechanical Engineering

Abstract

Bioprinting is a promising technique that has the ability to generate complex tissue structures for articular cartilage (AC) repair and regeneration. However, most biomaterials used for bioprinting are incapable of representing the complexity of native extracellular matrix (ECM). In this study, a novel cartilage specific bioink has been developed with tyramine modified hyaluronic acid (THA) and decellularized ECM (dECM) of AC for threedimensional bioprinting, combining the printable qualities of THA with AC dECM to create an optimized microenvironment. First, the influence of increasing concentrations of
AC dECM on the rheological and printability properties was assessed. Next, human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) were incorporated into bioinks composed of 2.5% w/v THA and AC dECM (0.0%-1.0% w/v). The THA-AC dECM bioinks have been successfully bioprinted into stable scaffolds with viable cells and were cultured for 28 days in chondrogenic differentiation medium. Subsequently, the effect of combining AC dECM with THA was evaluated by measuring the cell viability, cell differentiation and AC tissue deposition. The ink compositions with AC dECM (0.5% and 1.0% w/v) caused an increase in ink viscosity, yield stress and damping factor compared to the THA ink, but still showed shear thinning behavior and provided good printability. Spread cell morphology was observed for the scaffolds with addition of AC dECM compared to AC dECM free control with only THA, indicating enhanced cell adhesion to the hydrogel network. Moreover, a higher production of sulfated glycosaminoglycans (sGAGs) was observed for the scaffolds where AC dECM was added. The THA and AC dECM bioink composition showed promising results for AC tissue engineering and warrants further research into the development of bioinks with tissue-specific inductive properties.