Anharmonicity in bcc refractory elements

A detailed ab initio analysis

Journal Article (2023)
Author(s)

Prashanth Srinivasan (University of Stuttgart, TU Delft - (OLD) MSE-7)

Alexander Shapeev (Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology)

Jörg Neugebauer (Max-Planck-Institut für Eisenforschung)

F.H.W. Körmann (TU Delft - Team Marcel Sluiter, Max-Planck-Institut für Eisenforschung)

Blazej Grabowski (University of Stuttgart)

Research Group
Team Marcel Sluiter
Copyright
© 2023 P. Srinivasan, Alexander Shapeev, Jörg Neugebauer, F.H.W. Körmann, Blazej Grabowski
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.014301
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Copyright
© 2023 P. Srinivasan, Alexander Shapeev, Jörg Neugebauer, F.H.W. Körmann, Blazej Grabowski
Research Group
Team Marcel Sluiter
Issue number
1
Volume number
107
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Explicit anharmonicity, defined as the vibrational contribution beyond the quasiharmonic approximation, is qualitatively different between the group V and group VI bcc refractory elements. Group V elements show a small and mostly negative anharmonic entropy, whereas group VI elements have a large positive anharmonic entropy, strongly increasing with temperature. Here, we explain this difference utilizing highly accurate anharmonic free energies and entropies from ab initio calculations for Nb and Ta (group V), and Mo and W (group VI). The numerically calculated entropies are in agreement with prior experimental data. The difference in behavior between the two sets of elements arises not from their high-temperature behavior but rather from the 0K quasiharmonic reference state. We understand this by analyzing the 0K and the high-temperature phonon density of states and the electronic density of states. The qualitative difference disappears when the anharmonicity is instead referenced with a high-temperature effective harmonic potential. However, even for an optimized effective harmonic reference, the remaining effective anharmonicity is significant. The reason is that the anharmonicity in the bcc systems - carried by asymmetric distributions in the nearest neighbors - can never be accounted for by a harmonically restricted potential.

Files

PhysRevB.107.014301.pdf
(pdf | 2.4 Mb)
License info not available