Data-driven inverse optimization with imperfect information

Journal Article (2018)
Author(s)

Peyman Mohajerinesfahani (TU Delft - Team Tamas Keviczky)

Soroosh Shafieezadeh-Abadeh (École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne)

Grani A. Hanasusanto (The University of Texas at Austin)

Daniel Kuhn (École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne)

Research Group
Team Tamas Keviczky
Copyright
© 2018 P. Mohajerin Esfahani, Soroosh Shafieezadeh-Abadeh, Grani A. Hanasusanto, Daniel Kuhn
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-017-1216-6
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Copyright
© 2018 P. Mohajerin Esfahani, Soroosh Shafieezadeh-Abadeh, Grani A. Hanasusanto, Daniel Kuhn
Research Group
Team Tamas Keviczky
Issue number
1
Volume number
167
Pages (from-to)
191-234
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

In data-driven inverse optimization an observer aims to learn the preferences of an agent who solves a parametric optimization problem depending on an exogenous signal. Thus, the observer seeks the agent’s objective function that best explains a historical sequence of signals and corresponding optimal actions. We focus here on situations where the observer has imperfect information, that is, where the agent’s true objective function is not contained in the search space of candidate objectives, where the agent suffers from bounded rationality or implementation errors, or where the observed signal-response pairs are corrupted by measurement noise. We formalize this inverse optimization problem as a distributionally robust program minimizing the worst-case risk that the predicted decision (i.e., the decision implied by a particular candidate objective) differs from the agent’s actual response to a random signal. We show that our framework offers rigorous out-of-sample guarantees for different loss functions used to measure prediction errors and that the emerging inverse optimization problems can be exactly reformulated as (or safely approximated by) tractable convex programs when a new suboptimality loss function is used. We show through extensive numerical tests that the proposed distributionally robust approach to inverse optimization attains often better out-of-sample performance than the state-of-the-art approaches.

Files

MohajerinEsfahani2018_Article_... (pdf)
(pdf | 1.28 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 07-06-2018
License info not available