Analysis of Collective and Enhanced Individual Pitch Control Strategies for Wind Turbines

Conference Paper (2026)
Author(s)

Manuel Lara (Universidad de Cordoba)

Mario L. Ruz (Universidad de Cordoba)

Francisco Vazquez (Universidad de Cordoba)

Sebastiaan Paul Mulders (TU Delft - Team Mulders)

Jan Willem Van Wingerden (TU Delft - Team Jan-Willem van Wingerden)

Juan Garrido (Universidad de Cordoba)

Research Group
Team Mulders
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1109/MELECON64486.2026.11418863 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Team Mulders
Publisher
IEEE
ISBN (electronic)
979-8-3315-2684-9
Event
23rd IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference, MELECON 2026 (2026-02-02 - 2026-02-04), Cairo, Egypt
Downloads counter
5
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

In the nominal operating region of wind turbines, collective pitch control (CPC) regulates power by maintaining rated rotor speed, while individual pitch control (IPC) mitigates cyclic blade loads caused by wind variations like wind shear or turbulence. However, tuning CPC presents a significant trade-off, as improving power regulation often leads to an increase in fatigue blade loads. Additionally, IPC implementation via Multi-Blade Coordinate (MBC) transformation suffers from coupling between IPC loops, reducing controller effectiveness. Prior studies suggest that azimuth offset and static inverted decoupling enhance classical IPC implementations by mitigating this coupling. However, a comparative performance analysis between both implementations remains unexplored. This study addresses this analysis through a multi-objective optimization approach to tune CPC and IPC strategies for a 15 MW reference wind turbine. Four configurations (baseline CPC with conventional IPC, CPC+IPC, CPC+IPC with azimuth offset, and CPC+IPC with static inverted decoupling) are optimized. Results show that a well-tuned CPC improves IPC effectiveness, while the incorporation of azimuth offset or static inverted decoupling in IPC significantly improves both objectives, achieving reductions of approximately 19% in damage equivalent load on the blades and 60% in the integral squared error of power output compared to the baseline CPC with conventional IPC, and around 9% and 30% relative to the CPC with conventional IPC.

Files

Taverne
warning

File under embargo until 10-09-2026